Dane physicist Niels Bohr proposed the following things in 1927.
This claim is called the Copenhagen interpretation because the Niels Bohr Institute is in Copenhagen of Denmark. This is the mainstream interpretation of quantum mechanics.
John von Neumann and Eugene Paul Wigner expanded the Copenhagen interpretation and proposed the following thing in 1932.
This claim is called Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation. Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger thought that the interpretation had a problem. Then, he proposed the thought experiment, Schrödinger's cat in 1935.
We put a cat in a box. And we put observational equipment of decay of the radioisotope. We connect this observational equipment to a poison gas jet machine. When a radioisotope collapses, observation equipment sends a signal to the poison gas jet machine. As a result, the poison gas erupted and the cat will die.
The decay phenomenon of the radioisotope is described by a wave function. In other words, the state of the radioisotope becomes the superposition of the state that it collapsed and the state that it does not collapse, when the time passed. Therefore, we do not know whether the radioisotope decays until we observe it.
If Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation is correct, human consciousness causes collapse of the wave function. Therefore, the cat becomes the superposition of the life and death until the human observes it. We call this cat Schrödinger's cat.
The superposition of the life and death is lack of common sense. Therefore, Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation is not correct. This is the claim of Schrödinger.
The Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation is expansion of the Copenhagen interpretation. Schrödinger proposed the paradox of Schrödinger's cat in order to argue against the Von Neumann–Wigner interpretation.
According to the Copenhagen interpretation, physical systems generally do not have definite properties prior to being measured. There is no problem because a system of the cat does not have definite properties prior to being measured.
On the other hand, a living cat and a dead cat exist in other worlds in the many-worlds interpretation of Everett. However, there is still no experimental evidence indicating many-worlds interpretation being correct.
A debate continues, and this problem is unsolved in conclusion. I would like to wait for the future solution.
©2004, 2014 xseek-qm.net